nanog mailing list archives

Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:52:50 +0900

Imposing arbitary political considerations on organizations that are
simply trying to operate networks in order preserve maximal
aggregation at a given level seems absurd on the face of it.


arin policy weenies live for this!

randy

Current thread:

RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- - - RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sander Steffann (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Herbert (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
    - RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Leo Vegoda (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Randy Bush (Mar 09)
    - RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 09)
    - RE: filtering /48 is going to be necessary George Bonser (Mar 09)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Jimmy Hess (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary William Herrin (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 11)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Seth Mattinen (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Joel jaeggli (Mar 10)
    - Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 10)

(Thread continues...)