nanog mailing list archives
Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: Brandon Butterworth <brandon () rd bbc co uk>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:33:27 GMT
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> Handing one side an RIR-sponsored tactical nuclear weapon is, IMHO, on the face of it a bad idea. The proposal for classful allocation that Bill floated in the thread above would constitute doing exactly that
Certainly a risk but then we handed every nutter with BGP a dirty nuclear bomb instead. brandon
Current thread:
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary, (continued)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary james machado (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 15)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Ryan Malayter (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 12)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 11)
- Re: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Darrel Lewis (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Masataka Ohta (Mar 12)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Arturo Servin (Mar 11)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)
- Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary Owen DeLong (Mar 09)