nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4)
From: "Robert Glover"<robertg () garlic com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:25:41 -0800
Someone get this man a Xanax! -----Original message----- From: Guru NANOG <nanog.guru () gmail com> To: nanog <nanog () nanog org> Sent: 2012 Mar, Sun, 4 00:01:04 GMT+00:00 Subject: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Common Misconception - IPv4 is Out of Address Space NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) The 8-bit TTL field is reduced to 4-bits plus two 11 bits stuck at 1 for a long time The new 8-bit fields are: SD11TTTT Packets without the 11 will enter Deep Packet Inspection processing (slow) SD are new Source and Destination Address bits set via the generic AAAA 128-bit records 4+8+12+30+6 = 60 + 68 = 128 VRHL+111.T1.000+Port12+30+Frag6 T1 sets the TTL bits - Use T0 at your own risk - VRHL=0101=5 NANOG.GURU.☺
Current thread:
- NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Guru NANOG (Mar 03)
- Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Robert Glover (Mar 03)
- Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Leigh Porter (Mar 03)
- Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Mark Gauvin (Mar 03)
- Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Jay Hennigan (Mar 03)
- is 74.218.84.10 a road runner IP address? goemon (Mar 03)
- Message not available
- Re: is 74.218.84.10 a road runner IP address? Alex Conner (Mar 03)
- Re: is 74.218.84.10 a road runner IP address? goemon (Mar 03)
- is 74.218.84.10 a road runner IP address? goemon (Mar 03)
- Re: NANOG Operational TTL Alert for 160-bit Headers (aka IPv4) Robert Glover (Mar 03)