nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
From: Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:47:36 -0700
On Mar 28, 2012 2:25 PM, "Arturo Servin" <arturo.servin<arturo.servin () gmail com> @ <arturo.servin () gmail com>gmail.com <arturo.servin () gmail com>> wrote:
Another reason to not use them. Seriusly, if they cannot expend some thousands of dollars (because
it shouldn't be more than that) in "touching code, (hopefully) testing that code, deploying it, training customer support staff to answer questions, updating documentation, etc." I cannot take them as a serious provider for my names.
Not having ipv6 and your website availability tied to some overloaded cgn at an ISP you have no relationship with .... or your abuse policy just blocked what you thought was a /24 ... turns out to be verizon nat44 space for nyc ... and now x million customers can't click "buy now" .... priceless. CB
Regards, .as On 28 Mar 2012, at 21:16, John T. Yocum wrote:On 3/28/2012 12:13 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:I'm not convinced. What you mention is real, but the code they need is little more than a regular expression that can be found on Google and a 20-line script for testing lames. And a couple of weeks of testing, and I think I'm exaggerating. If they don't want to offer support for it, they can just put up some disclaimer. regards, Carlos On 3/28/12 3:55 PM, David Conrad wrote:On Mar 28, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote:I'm not a fan of conspiracy theories, but, c'mon. For a provisioning system, an AAAA record is just a fragging string, just like any other DNS record. How difficult to support can it be ?Of course it is more than a string. It requires touching code,
(hopefully) testing that code, deploying it, training customer support staff to answer questions, updating documentation, etc. Presumably Netsol did the cost/benefit analysis and decided the potential increase in revenue generated by the vast hordes of people demanding IPv6 (or the potential lost in revenue as the vast hordes transfer away) didn't justify the expense. Simple business decision.
Regards, -drcThat's assuming their system is sanely or logically designed. It could
be a total disaster of code, which makes adding such a feature a major pain.
--John
Current thread:
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?, (continued)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Arturo Servin (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Joseph Snyder (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Arturo Servin (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Mike Gallagher (Mar 28)
- RE: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Tony Patti (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? james jones (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Cameron Byrne (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Jeroen Massar (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Tim Franklin (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Cameron Byrne (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Rodrick Brown (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? bmanning (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Matt Ryanczak (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Arturo Servin (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Chris Adams (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Lynda (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)