nanog mailing list archives
Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?
From: Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:51:19 -0500
Once upon a time, Lynda <shrdlu () deaddrop org> said:
This really points out one of the biggest impediments to moving to IPv6. I just briefly looked at the list of registrars that are able to create glue records for any domain I might have that I wanted to exist in IPv6, and it's a very limited list. I'm currently using Pairnic, and I am happy with them, mostly, but moving to IPv6 is painful.
The same problem exists for DNSSEC; the number of registrars that support both IPv6 glue and DNSSEC in their standard interfaces is unfortunately small. -- Chris Adams <cmadams () hiwaay net> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
Current thread:
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ?, (continued)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Jeroen Massar (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Tim Franklin (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Cameron Byrne (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Brett Frankenberger (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Rodrick Brown (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? bmanning (Mar 28)
- Message not available
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Matt Ryanczak (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Arturo Servin (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 29)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Chris Adams (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Lynda (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Leo Bicknell (Mar 28)
- Re: Quad-A records in Network Solutions ? Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo (Mar 28)