nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simple Peering Agreement
From: Isabel Dias <isabeldias1 () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
http://www.as9009.net/policy/ --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net> wrote: From: Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net> Subject: Re: Simple Peering Agreement To: "NANOG (nanog () nanog org)" <nanog () nanog org> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 8:10 PM I need paperwork to justify several things the bean counters want to see on paper. It's hard to present why you need 5 additional 10Gig ports when you have nothing on paper of why those ports are being used. Justin -----Original Message----- From: Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012 1:57 PM To: "NANOG (nanog () nanog org)" <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: Simple Peering Agreement
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:are you any good in Maths? http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routin g%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdfIf you're good in maths, you'll realize that the simple peering agreement is the one that covers 99.5% of interconnections, and is well enough understood that it need not be committed to paper. :-) http://www.pch.net/resources/papers/peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011 .pdf -Bill -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP23eFAAoJEG+kcEsoi3+HSJ8P+wTeik0+xr1o5R8hTVsCKsrI +xwxAOzE5yjt8MXqAKqOWCFqWBWy1xaXcetUiKW/0SKjK+5Uz2OVUsPHnDc6xX/k clhM5b2rsB7T5NkRzBO26kfCMXEAL1v9peafxzc3XWjXuOtbf6UnBwH6+OIgiLrM +1Sbj/fVI/CwFYhpRRPW77itttfS6srka5uz06vB0XN69VQ7mn/bESOChaypf31K Vn3MZhn6byCVDcyrEOH5QtK5DAW1EQrZLbZA9e6VwrrartSjiwP9N9QuVGZ0fXhr uKnlQwxJXX1z/hC1REQcYLN4yuRcEFvKJj1t/3yuOoA00TvWZyYiKtzdTnUNmK5c BFPImwyod/X0qZHTfzik+dIHbO5vlS31jL/I4xmKn5PYKjNXSODx4viN+C39Je+r IR07ppVUv8du4cwDzxDVldFuT8HGv3X3fS5NI1iJUiJFqD5fR/6y1E4EOhGZkVa3 DI1WwEcSS/mJiW0BgHhuWmHAK++mXANP8qKWZcVNmP7BDwJ8hUKg4tltepVkyvUp VyPc4vOns/06TvEM3F8i2nCuCxDxhftsvHnGepYijvSPko25NDCOE5g2VBlITCf2 neGZ8xttsnTiAqGG5oHYsMWyMg1kjodGHMR2oBzPeNUTUMyOJFM2Ro8TfDvX9b1/ 43LgwdG9N3ExiUpAmKcO =lm/u -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Simple Peering Agreement Justin Wilson (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Bill Woodcock (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Justin Wilson (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement valdis . kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Bill Woodcock (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Garrett Skjelstad (Jun 15)