nanog mailing list archives
Re: Simple Peering Agreement
From: Isabel Dias <isabeldias1 () yahoo com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
are you any good in Maths? http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf maybe a PhD will find a point in using this part of their self-development how far can you go and what is your position in the world? I guess linking countries is easy if you are offer the position but you can't move from there can you? so the revenue in peering agreements not free peering but private peering is maybe what they look fw to achieve. i guess a new model might be under research as this one is an old IPv4 one and IPv6 peering agreements are in production ......maybe with internet 2 too....... --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net> wrote: From: Justin Wilson <lists () mtin net> Subject: Simple Peering Agreement To: "NANOG (nanog () nanog org)" <nanog () nanog org> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 7:24 PM Does anyone have a simple (1-2 page) peering agreement in plain English they would care to share offlist? Thanks, Justin -- Justin Wilson <j2sw () mtin net> Aol & Yahoo IM: j2sw http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News http://www.twitter.com/j2sw Follow me on Twitter
Current thread:
- Simple Peering Agreement Justin Wilson (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Bill Woodcock (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Justin Wilson (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement valdis . kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Bill Woodcock (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Isabel Dias (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Nick Hilliard (Jun 15)
- Re: Simple Peering Agreement Garrett Skjelstad (Jun 15)