nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon () ttec com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 09:31:20 -0400
Owen DeLong wrote:
Really, no. The L3 MTU on an interface should be configured to the lowest MTU reachable via that link without crossing a router. It's just that simple. Anything else _IS_ a misconfiguration.
Perhaps this should be thought of as a limitation, rather then a feature. Joe
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Mark Andrews (Jun 05)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels valdis . kletnieks (Jun 06)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 06)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 06)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)