nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 day and tunnels
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 01:43:09 +0900
Templin, Fred L wrote:
The proper solution is to have a field in IPv7 header to measure PMTU. It can be a 8 bit field, if fragment granularity is 256B.
We tried that for IPv4 and it didn't work very well [RFC1063].
IP option is a bad idea, which is partly why IPv6 sucks. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jeroen Massar (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- Re: New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- Re: New routing systems (Was: IPv6 day and tunnels) Jeroen Massar (Jun 05)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Masataka Ohta (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 04)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Joe Maimon (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Mark Andrews (Jun 05)
- RE: IPv6 day and tunnels Templin, Fred L (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Jimmy Hess (Jun 05)
- Re: IPv6 day and tunnels Owen DeLong (Jun 05)