nanog mailing list archives
Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:50:47 -0400
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:20 PM, PC <paul4004 () gmail com> wrote:
I'm sure they use carrier grade NAT, yes.
I'm sure it's not 'carrier grade', but it does play one on tv...
However, nothing would prevent them from using a unique public IP assigned to them for their DNS servers like others do.
sure. they could do lots of things.
Using RFC1918 space for a routed destination of an ISP service (DNS) is particularly problematic for many VPN client configurations with corporate address range overlap.
of course, but you aren't supposed to be doing that on their network anyway... so says the nice man from sprint 4 nanogs ago. -chris (yes, I realize that people use the 'wireless' network for all manner of things that the 'wireless carriers' are not always happy about, but hell, they do give out 'internet protocol' connections, they ought to expect people to 'use' them, eh?)
Current thread:
- technical contact at ATT Wireless Mike Devlin (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jonathan Lassoff (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Joel Maslak (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Cameron Byrne (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jared Mauch (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Tyler Haske (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jared Mauch (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Tyler Haske (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Owen DeLong (Jun 29)