nanog mailing list archives
Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless
From: PC <paul4004 () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:20:51 -0600
I'm sure they use carrier grade NAT, yes. However, nothing would prevent them from using a unique public IP assigned to them for their DNS servers like others do. Using RFC1918 space for a routed destination of an ISP service (DNS) is particularly problematic for many VPN client configurations with corporate address range overlap. -Paul On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists () gmail com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:35 PM, PC <paul4004 () gmail com> wrote:Why they don't use public IP space belonging to them for DNS servers, Idonot know.they have the same addresses used in multiple VRF's? so much simpler for them to manage...
Current thread:
- technical contact at ATT Wireless Mike Devlin (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jonathan Lassoff (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Christopher Morrow (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless PC (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Joel Maslak (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Cameron Byrne (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jared Mauch (Jun 28)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Tyler Haske (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Jared Mauch (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Tyler Haske (Jun 29)
- Re: technical contact at ATT Wireless Owen DeLong (Jun 29)