nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Update
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:54:09 +0300
At 00:28 06/07/2012 -0700, goemon () anime net wrote:
"We take responsibility for that lack of clarity, and we are taking steps to make this right."including firing the idiot responsible?
The Nussbacher axiom of management - "Management is like a cesspool - the really big chunks float to the top". I would assume the person responsible will one day be running Cisco.
-Hank
-Dan On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the intent of the service. http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/ CB On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea () charterschoolit com> wrote:Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join itsCloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service-Mario Eirea
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco Update, (continued)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jimmy Hess (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 07)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeroen van Aart (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update Tyler Haske (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update goemon (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)