nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Update
From: goemon () anime net
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 00:28:41 -0700 (PDT)
"We take responsibility for that lack of clarity, and we are taking steps to make this right."
including firing the idiot responsible? -Dan On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
In Cisco's defense, perhaps the legalese did not fully communicate the intent of the service. http://blogs.cisco.com/home/update-answering-our-customers-questions-about-cisco-connect-cloud-2/ CB On Jul 5, 2012 8:52 AM, "Mario Eirea" <meirea () charterschoolit com> wrote:Has anyone seen this yet? Looks like Cisco was forcing people to join itsCloud service through an update for it's consumer level routers.http://www.neowin.net/news/cisco-locks-users-out-of-their-routers-requires-invasive-cloud-service-Mario Eirea
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco Update, (continued)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jimmy Hess (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Randy Bush (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 07)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeroen van Aart (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update Tyler Haske (Jul 11)
- Re: Cisco Update goemon (Jul 06)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)