nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco Update
From: Sean Harlow <sean () seanharlow info>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 12:48:48 -0400
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:42, Jon Lewis wrote:
Routers are sometimes used on networks that don't have internet connectivity [by design]. This seems amazingly short-sighted for a company that's been around selling routing gear as long as cisco.
Not to defend Cisco's idiotic decision, but in this case the devices in question are extremely unlikely to be used in such a situation as they are consumer/SOHO products. The vast, overwhelming majority of these will be installed as the primary and/or only piece of network hardware other than the modem. I'd imagine that anyone who knows enough to care about a non-connected situation was never considering these devices in the first place. Frankly for the Joe Sixpack market I can't argue against the autoupdate idea itself, as outdated consumer routers probably account for a large percentage of the exploitable Linux systems out there, but the "cloud" tie in and privacy issues are clearly not well thought out.
Current thread:
- Cisco Update Mario Eirea (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Sean Harlow (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jon Lewis (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Sean Harlow (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Scott Howard (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Hank Nussbacher (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Sean Harlow (Jul 05)
- RE: Cisco Update David Hubbard (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Grant Ridder (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Joe Greco (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Jeff Johnstone (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Ray Soucy (Jul 05)
- Re: Cisco Update Andriy Bilous (Jul 05)
- RE: Cisco Update Keith Medcalf (Jul 05)
- RE: Cisco Update Keith Medcalf (Jul 05)