nanog mailing list archives

Re: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?


From: Dave Pooser <dave.nanog () alfordmedia com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:34:53 -0600

On 1/25/12 10:28 AM, "Nick Hilliard" <nick () foobar org> wrote:

I wish you luck selling this notion to enterprise network people, most of
who appear to believe that rfc1918 address space is a feature, not a bug.

Until they've gone through an M&A where they had to connect multiple sites
using overlapping RFC1918 space, of course. Then the idea of globally
unique addressing, even if it's not globally routable, starts looking
awfully useful.
-- 
Dave Pooser
Manager of Information Services
Alford Media  http://www.alfordmedia.com




Current thread: