nanog mailing list archives
Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:19:06 +0000
On 20/01/2012 15:48, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I find using MRTG is easier than Cacti for _automation_ purposes.
It also has another slightly subtle but hugely useful advantage: the primary index reference of a graph does not refer to an interface name or a number, but can be defined as an arbitrary unique token. This is ridiculously useful when it comes to 3rd party scripting and moving customers around the place Nick
Current thread:
- Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Keegan Holley (Jan 19)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Dale W. Carder (Jan 19)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Jimmy Hess (Jan 19)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Leo Bicknell (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Keegan Holley (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Nick Hilliard (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Ian Goodall (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Leo Bicknell (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Keegan Holley (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Nick Hilliard (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Jimmy Hess (Jan 19)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Dale W. Carder (Jan 19)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Chris Adams (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Steve Clark (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Keegan Holley (Jan 20)
- RE: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Nathan Eisenberg (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Matt Addison (Jan 20)
- Re: Polling Bandwidth as an Aggregate Jeff Gehlbach (Jan 20)