nanog mailing list archives
Re: Common operational misconceptions
From: Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:29:20 +0000
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 19:18, Robert Bonomi <bonomi () mail r-bonomi com> wrote: ....
And the _real_ number crunchers used ones-complement arithmetic.
Not to mention 0 had a sign (and 0 did not compare as equal to -0).
Current thread:
- Re: Common operational misconceptions, (continued)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jens Link (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jon Lewis (Feb 26)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Marcel Plug (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions Brandt, Ralph (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Robert Bonomi (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Gary Buhrmaster (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Tom Perrine (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Randy Bush (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Owen DeLong (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jimmy Hess (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions -Hammer- (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Gary Buhrmaster (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 17)
- Re: Common operational misconceptions Jeff Kell (Feb 17)
- RE: Common operational misconceptions George Bonser (Feb 17)