nanog mailing list archives
Re: time sink 42
From: Joe Greco <jgreco () ns sol net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:06:55 -0600 (CST)
ok, this is horribly pragmatic, but it's real. yesterday i was in the westin playing rack and stack for five hours. an horrifyingly large amount of my time was spent trying to peel apart labels made on my portable brother label tape maker, yes peeling the backing from a little label so remote hands could easily confirm a server they were going to attack. is there a trick? is there a (not expensive) different labeling machine or technique i should use?
I hate all the newer Brother labelmakers I've seen - pretty much for this very reason. I've never found a good method for quickly and reliably removing the backings for them. We have a bunch of older Brother PT-20's that use the TC-20 tape. This is a generally awesome but a little limited labelmaker. It's a bit big, but it does offer a nicer keyboard than most current devices. The three maybe-gotchas all involve the tape being a multipart tape: you have a sticky backing on which the lettering is printed, which is then covered with a very resilient plastic laminate covering, all pressed together/ assembled inside the tape cartridge as part of the printing process. 1) Sometimes, when removing the labels, the plastic laminate cover will delaminate from the sticky tape - leaving a peeling-it-off nightmare. In all fairness, the types of surface that this happens on typically cause Brother TZ-style labels to shred too. I have never fully identified the types of surfaces involved, but some plastics seem to be the biggest trouble. 2) Occasionally, with age, we've seen short sections (~.5cm) delaminate and leave a little "loop" or "bubble" in the middle of a label. Usually in hot/humid environments. 3) Due to the lamination technique, the label is very springy and cannot be used for cable markings. Other than these occasional issues, we have been exceedingly pleased with the PT-20's for many years, perhaps as many as 20 years now. They're great for marking all sorts of things, from file folders to electronic gear. I would avoid the newer Brother units I've seen in favor of some of the other units people have mentioned, but for inexpensive basic server marking, I still really like the PT-20's. ... JG -- Joe Greco - sol.net Network Services - Milwaukee, WI - http://www.sol.net "We call it the 'one bite at the apple' rule. Give me one chance [and] then I won't contact you again." - Direct Marketing Ass'n position on e-mail spam(CNN) With 24 million small businesses in the US alone, that's way too many apples.
Current thread:
- Re: time sink 42, (continued)
- Re: time sink 42 Jay Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Karl Auer (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Jerry Jones (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Sven Olaf Kamphuis (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Aled Morris (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Jay Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Jay Ashworth (Feb 17)
- Re: Which way to fold the label (was: Re: time sink 42) Karl Auer (Feb 17)
- Re: time sink 42 Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: time sink 42 Nathan Eisenberg (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 Leo Bicknell (Feb 16)
- Re: time sink 42 harold barker (Feb 16)
- Which P-Touch should I have? Jay Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Joe Hamelin (Feb 16)
- Re: Which P-Touch should I have? Owen DeLong (Feb 16)
- RE: Which P-Touch should I have? Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. (Feb 16)