nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
From: "Scott Weeks" <surfer () mauigateway com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:11:52 -0800
--- mtinka () globaltransit net wrote: From: Mark Tinka <mtinka () globaltransit net> A big fail to our community, for up to this day, not implementing basic routing and forwarding filters that would do away with all this cruft in the first place. Clearly the Youtube/Pakistan/PCCW incident has long been forgotten. ----------------------------------- I know of folks in charge of BGP enabled networks (with downstream BGP customers as well) that have never heard of the Youtube/Pakistan/PCCW incident and don't care if they put extra routes in the table and I doubt that is an isolated situation. Further, I doubt it will change unless they're forced to care by technology somehow. An unfortunate situation for sure... scott
Current thread:
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges, (continued)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Christopher Morrow (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Alex Band (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 06)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges goemon (Feb 05)
- RE: Hijacked Network Ranges George Bonser (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Mark Tinka (Feb 05)
- Re: Hijacked Network Ranges Michael Hallgren (Feb 05)