nanog mailing list archives

Re: dns and software, was Re: Reliable Cloud host ?


From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:59:28 -0500

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
On Feb 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, William Herrin wrote:
Meh. What should be fixed is that connect() should receive a name
instead of an IP address. Having an application deal directly with the
IP address should be the exception rather than the rule. Then, deal
with the TTL issues once in the standard libraries instead of
repeatedly in every single application.

In theory, that'd even make the app code protocol agnostic so that it
doesn't have to be rewritten yet again for IPv12.

While I agree with the principle of what you are trying to say, I would argue
that it should be dealt with in getnameinfo() / getaddrinfo() and not connect().

It is perfectly reasonable for connect() to deal with an address structure.

Yes, well, that's why we're still using a layer 4 protocol (TCP) that
can't dynamically rebind to the protocol level below (IP). God help us
when folks start overriding the ethernet MAC address to force machines
to keep the same IPv6 address that's been hardcoded somewhere or is
otherwise too much trouble to change.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin () dirtside comĀ  bill () herrin us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004


Current thread: