nanog mailing list archives
Re: btw, the itu imploded
From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:14:04 -0500
You can look at the final outcome yourself (no password needed), at http://www.itu.int/en/wcit-12/Documents/final-acts-wcit-12.pdfRESOLUTION PLEN/5 on page 27 (by PDF count, out of 30 pages) describes work to be done by Study Group 3 and cooperating members. Note that the resolution is not part of the preceding treaty text.
On 19/12/2012 9:25 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Bill Woodcock <woody () pch net> wrote:The main unfortunate outcome is that the ITU has managed to get Study Group 3 approved to try to figure out how to override peering agreements with government-imposed settlements.Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying to interfere with Internet peering and settlement. Tony.
Current thread:
- btw, the itu imploded Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded - NOT bmanning (Dec 14)
- RE: btw, the itu imploded Warren Bailey (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Mike A (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tom Taylor (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Gordon Lennox (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Phil Regnauld (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)