nanog mailing list archives
Re: btw, the itu imploded
From: Tony Finch <dot () dotat at>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:17:23 +0000
Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org> wrote:
On 19/12/2012 14:25, Tony Finch wrote:Do you have any citations for that? I thought they had given up on trying to interfere with Internet peering and settlement.http://www.itu.int/net/ITU-T/lists/questions.aspx?Group=03&Period=15
Looks vaguely ominous. Do they have a document which gives their definition of "international telecommunications services" and "NGNs"? Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <dot () dotat at> http://dotat.at/ Forties, Cromarty: East, veering southeast, 4 or 5, occasionally 6 at first. Rough, becoming slight or moderate. Showers, rain at first. Moderate or good, occasionally poor at first.
Current thread:
- btw, the itu imploded Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded - NOT bmanning (Dec 14)
- RE: btw, the itu imploded Warren Bailey (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Mike A (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tony Finch (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Nick Hilliard (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Bill Woodcock (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Tom Taylor (Dec 19)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Gordon Lennox (Dec 14)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Phil Regnauld (Dec 16)
- Re: btw, the itu imploded Doug Barton (Dec 16)