nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited
From: Vlad Galu <galu () packetdam com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 21:51:16 +0100
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
I'm not clear what you care about from a performance point of view - forwarding ? acting as a route-server ? collector ? BIRD is a great, super-fast route-server daemon - much "better" than typical competitors Quagga and OpenBGPd at this job. In a forwarding capacity, I do not know and I would really think that Operating system performance and environment tuning will have more to do with forwarding performance than the daemon used.
+1. FIB performance and RIB performance are two very different things, and the former depends on the OS. Besides (although I haven't checked this recently), Quagga still does not support multiple FIBs. -- PacketDam: a cost-effective software solution against DDoS
Current thread:
- Bird vs Quagga revisited Hank Nussbacher (Aug 21)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andy Davidson (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Vlad Galu (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Guillaume Barrot (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited John Souter (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Arnold Nipper (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Christian Esteve Rothenberg (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited David Lamparter (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Seth Mattinen (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Walter Keen (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Edward J. Dore (Aug 29)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Eduardo Schoedler (Aug 29)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Laurent GUERBY (Aug 31)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Arnold Nipper (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andy Davidson (Aug 22)