nanog mailing list archives
Bird vs Quagga revisited
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:19:39 +0300
Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a thread from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Filip_BIRD_final_N48.pdf as well as the NANOG thread: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/123027 But have not found anything worthwhile on the matter over the past 2 years. Both Quagga and BIRD have developed since the comparison in 2010: http://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=quagga http://bird.network.cz/?o_newsBut has anyone performed a more recent comparsion? Does Quagga still suffer from performance issues vs BIRD? Has anyone performed an RFC conformance test to see who complies more strictly to all the various RFCs?
If BIRD is so much better than Quagga why is there no instance at Oregon: http://www.routeviews.org/ I also notice that BSD Router Project supports both: http://bsdrp.net/bsdrpHow well do the two coexist at the same time? Any migration issues going from Quagga to BIRD? Any feedback appreciated.
We now take you back to cable wars :-) Thanks, Hank
Current thread:
- Bird vs Quagga revisited Hank Nussbacher (Aug 21)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andy Davidson (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Vlad Galu (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Guillaume Barrot (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited John Souter (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Arnold Nipper (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Christian Esteve Rothenberg (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited David Lamparter (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Seth Mattinen (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Walter Keen (Aug 28)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Edward J. Dore (Aug 29)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Arnold Nipper (Aug 22)
- Re: Bird vs Quagga revisited Andy Davidson (Aug 22)