nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:53:46 +0200
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 09:41:51AM -0400, Russ White <russw () riw us> wrote a message of 60 lines which said:
Neither a DNS based solution nor the RPKI will resolve path attacks,
I want to be sure of the terminology: what is deployed presently is the bundle RPKI+ROA. As their name say, ROA can only be used against origin attacks. But RPKI can be used for other things than RPKI+ROA, including BGP-sec (against path-based attacks), no?
Current thread:
- rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Cameron Byrne (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Cameron Byrne (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)