nanog mailing list archives
Re: rpki vs. secure dns?
From: Matt Ryanczak <ryanczak () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 18:16:38 -0400
On 04/27/2012 06:05 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
this seems late, compared to the various commitments made to rpki in recent years. is anybody taking it seriously?
first thing that sprung to mind was this: http://www.cafepress.com.au/nxdomain
Current thread:
- rpki vs. secure dns? Paul Vixie (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Cameron Byrne (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Russ White (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 30)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Cameron Byrne (Apr 27)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Randy Bush (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Alex Band (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Florian Weimer (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Nick Hilliard (Apr 28)
- Re: rpki vs. secure dns? Phil Regnauld (Apr 28)