nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 04:57:34 -0400
On 9/26/11 4:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is this with strict NXDOMAIN rewriting, or were existing names redirected as well? (AFAIK, most platforms do the latter, hijacking bfk.de, for example.)
Has anybody tried bringing a criminal complaint for interference with computer (network) data? Certainly, hijacking google.com NS records to JOMAX.NET would be a criminal interference. After all, that's all DNSsec signed now, isn't it? Arguably, substituting a false reply for NXDOMAIN would be, too. It's time to find a champion to lead the charge. Maybe Google?
Current thread:
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue, (continued)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Alexander Harrowell (Sep 25)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Nick Hilliard (Sep 25)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Jimmy Hess (Sep 25)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Alexander Harrowell (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Alexander Harrowell (Sep 25)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Florian Weimer (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Cameron Byrne (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Cameron Byrne (Sep 26)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Jimmy Hess (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 27)
- Re: Nxdomain redirect revenue Christopher Morrow (Sep 27)