nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling

From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:06:06 +0100

On 16/09/2011 00:51, Schiller, Heather A wrote:

I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte ASN's?


Wasn't there an RFC written about this by some australian bloke?  I'd say
that whoever maintains the CIDR report these days should really take a
couple of minutes to clue themselves in about asplain syntax.

Nick

Current thread:

The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 09)
  - RE: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Schiller, Heather A (Sep 15)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Daniel Roesen (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Joe Hamelin (Sep 16)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 16)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 23)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 30)