nanog mailing list archives

Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling

From: Daniel Roesen <dr () cluenet de>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:16:01 +0200

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:11:24AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:

I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte
ASN's?


as-plain is not the "standard" per se.


RFC5396 on as-plain is on track becoming one.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr () cluenet de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0

Current thread:

The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 09)
  - RE: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Schiller, Heather A (Sep 15)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Daniel Roesen (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Nick Hilliard (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Tassos Chatzithomaoglou (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
    - Re: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling Joe Hamelin (Sep 16)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 16)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 23)
- The Cidr Report cidr-report (Sep 30)