RE: NAT444 or ?

[Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cameron Byrne [mailto:cb.list6 () gmail com]
> Ip mobility via gtp or mobile ip generally does not work when you nat
> at the
> 'edge'.  If you don't want your ip address to change every time you
> change
> cell sites, the nat has to be centralized.
>
> Cb

Indeed, networks with some kind of anchor point (even xDSL networks with a LNS that terminates PPP sessions) really 
lend themselves to a big fat NAT box simply because there is a single point where all the connections appear anyway so 
why not have a single box doing NAT/DPI/etc as well?

I'd agree that, usually, distributed is better but these are not distributed networks, there is a single point (or a 
few large single points) of contact.

--
Leigh



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________