nanog mailing list archives
Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider
From: Richard Kulawiec <rsk () gsp org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:43:09 -0400
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 08:22:53PM -0400, Chris wrote:
For folks who say hosting companies are not helpful: Linode, Amazon, BurstNET, Ubiquity Servers and others are extremely responsive to abuse complaints.
Burstnet is one of the filthiest sewers on the entire Internet. Has been for many years. They are vehemently pro-spam. See, for example: http://groups.google.com/group/news.admin.net-abuse.email/msg/fba14415f70e08c8 They are thus not a good counterexample to use in this case. ---rsk
Current thread:
- XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Chris (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Nicolai (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Chris (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider William Pitcock (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Chris (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider William Pitcock (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider William Herrin (Oct 27)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Kyle Creyts (Oct 30)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider William Pitcock (Oct 26)
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Richard Kulawiec (Oct 27)
- Message not available
- Re: XSServer / Taking down a spam friendly provider Chris (Oct 30)