nanog mailing list archives
Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter () ukbroadband com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:54:58 +0000
On 25 Oct 2011, at 09:34, "Tim" <timphp () progressivemarketingnetwork com> wrote:
This sadly is very common. It is getting more common by the day it seems but this practice has started almost a decade ago. An easy work around is to use a custom port as they seem to just block port 25 as a bad port but leave just about everything else open including 2525 which seems to be a common secondary smtp port for hosting companies.
I use port 80 which has not failed me so far ;-) -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
Current thread:
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers, (continued)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Owen DeLong (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Bill Stewart (Oct 28)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 31)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Mike Jones (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers McCall, Gabriel (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Jay Ashworth (Oct 30)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Leigh Porter (Oct 26)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers J (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Blake Hudson (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Graham Beneke (Oct 25)