nanog mailing list archives
Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers
From: J <nanog () namor ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:25:06 -0500
Blake Hudson wrote:
If 587 becomes popular, spammers will move on and the same ISPs that blocked 25 will follow suit.
I don't see this happening as easily. Authenticated means an easier shutdown of an account, rather than some form of port block/etc.
A better solution would have been to prevent infection or remove infected machines from the network(strong abuse policies, monitoring, give out free antivirus software, etc).
We have 2/3 of that. Antivirus helps some, but has some side-effects on the helpdesk, if they're also the first response tier. I find it strange mentioning 'monitoring' alongside 'freedoms', though.
Unfortunately, I don't see the trend reversing. I'm afraid that Internet freedoms are likely to continue to decline and an "Unlimited" Internet experience won't exist at the residential level in 5+ years.
I'll agree with that.
Current thread:
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers, (continued)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 31)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers William Herrin (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Mike Jones (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Brian Johnson (Oct 28)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers McCall, Gabriel (Oct 28)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Jay Ashworth (Oct 30)
- RE: Outgoing SMTP Servers Tim (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Leigh Porter (Oct 26)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Blake Hudson (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers J (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Blake Hudson (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Graham Beneke (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers J (Oct 25)
- Re: Outgoing SMTP Servers Robert Drake (Oct 25)