nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes
From: Jack Bates <jbates () brightok net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:20:42 -0500
On 10/19/2011 12:48 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:Dont mix up peering and transit connections!I've nearly given up on this. I've heard many a small provider say they are "Peering" with level3 when they mean "we are buying transit from Level3". Many people equate having BGP up with them to mean something else.
And yet I might pay for transit from Sprint, but decide to limit routes to just between us (which is peering, but technically I'm paying for transit).
Terminology has always been a blast. Jack
Current thread:
- BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 18)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Thilo Bangert (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Randy Bush (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes bmanning (Oct 19)