nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:48:37 -0400
On Oct 19, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Dont mix up peering and transit connections!
I've nearly given up on this. I've heard many a small provider say they are "Peering" with level3 when they mean "we are buying transit from Level3". Many people equate having BGP up with them to mean something else. - Jared
Current thread:
- BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 18)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Thilo Bangert (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Randy Bush (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Nathanael C. Cariaga (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Raymond Dijkxhoorn (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jared Mauch (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes Jack Bates (Oct 19)
- Re: BGP Peers as basis of available routes bmanning (Oct 19)