Re: Arguing against using public IP space

[-Hammer- <bhmccie () gmail com>]

Guys,
    Everyone is complaining about whether a FW serves its purpose or 
not. Take a step back. Security is about layers. Router ACLs to filter 
whitenoise. FW ACLs to filter more. L7 (application) FWs to inspect HTTP 
payload. Patch management at the OS and Application layer on the server. 
Heuristics analyzing strategically placed SPAN feeds. The list goes on 
depending upon the size of your enterprise.

I don't think in a large environment you can avoid "complexity" these 
days. What you have to succeed at is managing that complexity. And L3 
FWs have a very important purpose. They filter garbage. You focus your 
IDS/IPS on what the FW is allowing. It's more than a screen door. But 
yes, it's LESS than a true vault door. It's all about mitigating the 
risk. You'll never be 100% full proof.

-Hammer-

"I was a normal American nerd"
-Jack Herer



On 11/15/2011 08:56 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:17 AM,<Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu>  wrote:
>    
> > And this is totally overlooking the fact that the vast majority of *actual*
> > attacks these days are web-based drive-bys and similar things that most
> > firewalls are configured to pass through.
> >      
> Valdis,
>
> A firewall's job is to prevent the success of ACTIVE attack vectors
> against your network. If your firewall successfully restricts
> attackers to passive attack vectors (drive-by downloads) and social
> engineering vectors then it has done everything reasonably expected of
> it. Those other parts of the overall network security picture are
> dealt with elsewhere in system security apparatus. So it's no mistake
> than in a discussion of firewalls those two attack vectors do not
> feature prominently.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
>