nanog mailing list archives
Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space)
From: Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 11:13:41 -0400
Me personally? No, but I have used it. IP over 9600baud serial actually isn't that bad for IRC when you're in the middle of the woods and all. You want slow... read about winlink2000, the email/messaging system for hams and emergency response. It's PSK on HF, meant to be reliable but if you get more than 400bps you are doing GREAT! It's so slow that you can run the software on two laptops using the sound cards, and they'll talk across the room via speakers and mics no problem. It sounds kinda like robots rapping. -Jack Carrozzo On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christopher Pilkington <cjp () 0x1 net>wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jack Carrozzo <jack () crepinc com> wrote:Nope, mostly HF (under 30mhz) gear at 300baud. Yes, you read that right.You are running IP on this? And I though 1200 bauds half duplex was slow.
Current thread:
- Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Christopher Pilkington (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Christopher Pilkington (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Carl Rosevear (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jaime Magiera (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Carl Rosevear (May 26)
- RE: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Owen DeLong (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Christopher Pilkington (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Wil Schultz (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) David Conrad (May 26)
- Re: Ham Radio Networking (was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space) Jack Carrozzo (May 26)