nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 23:45:27 -0400
On Tue, 24 May 2011 22:22:20 CDT, Jeremy said:
As long as necessary precautions are taken (route filters, tunnels, VRF's) shouldn't this be technically feasible without any negative ramifications?
The types of network designers who are able to cover *every single* little detail needed to make this sort of thing work are rarely the types of network designers that would snarf up somebody else's prefix to use for this sort of thing, and vice versa.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space, (continued)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space D'Arcy J.M. Cain (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Rubens Kuhl (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Owen DeLong (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Godwin was here ... was Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 Edward Lewis (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Jimmy Hess (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Jay Ashworth (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Steven Bellovin (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Jeremy (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Valdis . Kletnieks (May 24)
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space Cameron Byrne (May 24)