nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space


From: Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:50:10 -0400


On May 24, 2011, at 9:29 06PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jimmy Hess" <mysidia () gmail com>

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:34 PM, <Vinny_Abello () dell com> wrote:
I think those within the organization that deploy those vehicles or
are Navy SEALs might sit at different lunch tables than the guys worried
about IP address collisions. ;-)

The F/A-18 Hornets, F/A-22 Raptors are well, and good, but that's old
technology The folks in charge of the MQ-1 predator drones might sit closer to
the guys worried about the IP addresses.

And automated drone strikes can always be blamed on a malfunction
caused by the hijacking

If packets that control armed drones cross any router that has access even to 
SIPRnet, much less the Internet, someone's getting relieved.

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Militants-Hack-Unencrypted-Drone-Feeds-477219/

                --Steve Bellovin, https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb







Current thread: