nanog mailing list archives

Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes


From: David Miller <dmiller () tiggee com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 09:42:14 -0400

On 5/3/2011 6:17 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On May 2, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
It's perhaps worth noting that there is work in the IETF to recommend that every prefix originated as part of an anycast cloud 
uses a unique origin AS (see<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-unique-origin-as-00>). I'm not personally convinced 
of the arguments in the draft, but mentioning it in this thread seems reasonable.
I'm also not convinced of the arguments in the draft, since it argues that it would be a best-practice for me to originate my address space 
from more than 8,000 different ASNs, when I currently do just fine advertising it from three.  I'd much rather there not exist a document 
that clueless people can point at and claim is a "best common practice" when it's neither best nor common.

                                 -Bill

+1

We are not convinced and are not planning on implementing this draft either.

-DM



Current thread: