nanog mailing list archives
Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2011 07:33:36 +0200
It's perhaps worth noting that there is work in the IETF to recommend that every prefix originated as part of an anycast cloud uses a unique origin AS (see <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-unique-origin-as-00>). I'm not personally convinced of the arguments in the draft, but mentioning it in this thread seems reasonable.I'm also not convinced of the arguments in the draft, since it argues that it would be a best-practice'A', not 'the', for the reasons conveyed in the draft (e.g., control plane discriminator, RPKI foundations, etc..).
danny, could you explain why this has anything to do with the rpki and origin validation? randy
Current thread:
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes, (continued)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Randy Bush (May 10)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Bill Woodcock (May 03)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 03)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes David Miller (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Danny McPherson (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes bmanning (May 05)
- Re: Suspecious anycast prefixes Randy Bush (May 06)