nanog mailing list archives
Re: 23,000 IP addresses
From: Bill Bogstad <bogstad () pobox com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:41:43 -0400
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Steven Bellovin <smb () cs columbia edu> wrote:
If I've found the right case, it was 05-1404, and published as 451 F.3d 226 (2006); see http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/451/226/627290/ I have no idea if it's still good law.
According to EDUCAUSE the appellate decision was complex: http://www.educause.edu/Policy+Analysis+%26+Advocacy/PressReleases/CALEACourtDecisionMixedforHigh/17136 This status page indicates that 'most' campus networks would be exempt: http://www.educause.edu/Resources/Browse/CALEA/30781 Definitely a case of 'talk to your lawyers' to be sure. Bill Bogstad bogstad () pobox com
Current thread:
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses, (continued)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- Message not available
- Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Luis Marta (May 10)
- Re: Fwd: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Owen DeLong (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Steven Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Kevin Oberman (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Justin M. Streiner (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Kevin Oberman (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Steven Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Bill Bogstad (May 10)
- Message not available
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Claudio Lapidus (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 10)
- RE: 23,000 IP addresses Keith Medcalf (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Roland Perry (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Painter (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Steven Bellovin (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Ong Beng Hui (May 10)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Ken Chase (May 11)
- Re: 23,000 IP addresses Michael Holstein (May 11)