nanog mailing list archives
Re: Regional AS model
From: "Jeffrey S. Young" <young () jsyoung net>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 10:50:19 +1100
While it's a very interesting read and it's always nice to know what Danny is up to, the concept is a pretty extreme corner case when you consider the original question. I took the original question to be about global versus regional AS in a provider backbone. On the other hand if we'd had this capability years ago the notion of a CDN based on anycasting would be viable in a multi-provider environment. Maybe time to revive that idea? jy On 25/03/2011, at 8:45 AM, David Conrad <drc () virtualized org> wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Jeffrey S. Young wrote:Multiple AS, one per region, is about extracting maximum revenue from your client base. In 2000 we had no technical reason to do it, I can't see a technical reason to do it today. This is a layer 8/9 issue.http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mcpherson-unique-origin-as-00 Regards, -drc
Current thread:
- Re: Regional AS model, (continued)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 27)
- Re: Regional AS model Nick Hilliard (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Dave Temkin (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Owen DeLong (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeff Wheeler (Mar 28)
- Re: Regional AS model David Conrad (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Danny McPherson (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeffrey S. Young (Mar 24)
- Re: Regional AS model Jeff Wheeler (Mar 24)