nanog mailing list archives

Re: The stupidity of trying to "fix" DHCPv6


From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 22:41:41 -0700


On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:44:22 -0400, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com> wrote:
BTW, does this broken software run over IPv6, anyway?

Poorly designed network plus poorly designed software... I don't know which chicken came first, and it doesn't matter.

IPv6 is totally different barnyard.  Build the v6 network properly -- one gateway (one router, vrrp, whatever) -- and 
retool the software properly.  IPv6 doesn't have a broadcast address; as such if the software is setup to use an 
appropriate multicast target (presumably in "user defined" space), then it'll talk to exactly the right machines, and 
it's routable.

--Ricky

Sounds great, but, sometimes proprietary vertical software is a lot harder to move forward than
you might think.

Owen



Current thread: