nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and DNS
From: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell () utc edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:46:20 -0400
On 6/12/2011 11:44 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I don't believe we were talking about DHCPv6, we were talking about SLAAC. And I *still* think it's a better idea for the client to be registering itself in DNS; the host knows what domain(s) it should be part of, and hence which names refer to itself and should be updated with it's new address.
Register with "what/which" DNS? If no DHCPv6 no DNS information has been acquired, so you're doing the magical anycast/multicast. Not a fan of self-registration, in IPv4 we have DHCP register the DDNS update; after all, it just handed out an address for a zone/domain that *it* knows for certain. The host "knows what domains it should be part of" ?? Perhaps a server or a fixed desktop, but otherwise (unless you're a big fan of ActiveDirectory anywhere) the domain is relative to the environment you just inherited. Letting any host register itself in my domain from any address/location is scary as heck :) Jeff
Current thread:
- IPv6 and DNS Fabio Mendes (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Ingo Flaschberger (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Fabio Mendes (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Arturo Servin (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Joel Jaeggli (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Jimmy Hess (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Jeff Kell (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Steven Bellovin (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Karl Auer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Karl Auer (Jun 13)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 11)