nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 and DNS
From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:41:52 +1000
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 09:38:32AM -0300, Fabio Mendes wrote:
2011/6/11 Matthew Palmer <mpalmer () hezmatt org>The router isn't assigning an address, it's merely telling everyone on the segment what the local prefix and default route is. As such, there's no reason why the router should try to register a DNS entry. On the other hand, the host could (and should) register it's address with whatever DNS server handles it's name. The protocol for such is already standardised and should be independent of IPv4/IPv6.I was thinking about something like this, it looks the natural way to go, but isn't too dangerous allow hosts to update entries (even if it's their own) in an DNS server ?
What are the hazards and risks?
I preferred to believe that a router would do this because routers are considered to be more reliable than a hosts.
Reliable, or trusted?
Do you mind to point me out where can I find infos about this protocol that is being standardised ?
RFC2136. - Matt
Current thread:
- IPv6 and DNS Fabio Mendes (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Ingo Flaschberger (Jun 11)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Fabio Mendes (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Arturo Servin (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Joel Jaeggli (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Jimmy Hess (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Jeff Kell (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Steven Bellovin (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Karl Auer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 12)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Karl Auer (Jun 13)
- Re: IPv6 and DNS Matthew Palmer (Jun 11)