nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & HE
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 00:56:37 -0700
On Jun 8, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:05:05PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen said:global reachability, in the hopes that it will strengthen their strategic position for peering in the long term (i.e. they both want to be an "IPv6 Tier 1"). I'm not making a judgement call about the rightness or wrongness of the strategy (and after all, it clearly hasn't been THAT big of an issue considering that it has been this way for MANY months), but to attempt to "blame" one party for this issue is the height of absurdity. PR stunts and cake baking not withstanding, they're both equally complicit.So we have to buy from BOTH HE and Cogent?! Sounds like market fixing to me! :/
Not at all... You can peer with HE. Try that with Cogent and then tell me it's the same. Owen
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent & HE, (continued)
- Re: Cogent & HE manny (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Nathan Eisenberg (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jared Mauch (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jay Hanke (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Martin Millnert (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Kevin Loch (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Saku Ytti (Jun 09)