nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent & HE
From: Jared Mauch <jared () puck nether net>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 16:17:45 -0400
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Ken Chase wrote:
So we have to buy from BOTH HE and Cogent?! Sounds like market fixing to me! :/ Guess if we do we can advertise that on our webpage... "now with BOTH halves of the ipv6 internets!"
Or neither. There are other networks that carry a full IPv6 table. If you are behind 174 or 6939 for IPv6 and have other transits, make sure you can use those ports as well for your IPv6 activities, even if you're just doing an internal trial. - Jared
Current thread:
- Cogent & HE Dennis Burgess (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Seth Mattinen (Jun 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cogent & HE Brielle Bruns (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE manny (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Nathan Eisenberg (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Ken Chase (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jared Mauch (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jay Hanke (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Owen DeLong (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Martin Millnert (Jun 09)
- Re: Cogent & HE Jack Bates (Jun 08)
- RE: Cogent & HE Paul Stewart (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 08)
- Re: Cogent & HE Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 08)