nanog mailing list archives

Re: OOB


From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () bogus com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 23:40:07 -0400

My measured availability for a automatic reverse ssh tunnel connection made through a 4g radio in the field was 52%. 
this was vs 95% on the lab/office environment with the same equipment. That particular experiment I declared a failure.

There was never a closer truism than ymmv.

joel

On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:33 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org> wrote:
Subject: Re: OOB Date: Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:14:21AM -0400 Quoting Christopher Morrow (morrowc.lists () gmail com):
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Paul Stewart <paul () paulstewart org> wrote:
We do everything in-band with strict monitoring/policies in place.

what do you do if your in-band fails? if a router/switch/ROADM is
isolated from the rest of your network?
(isn't that the core point of the OP?)

Vendor C sells nice small routers with something like CAB-OCTAL-ASYNC
_and_ a 3G modem instead of the BRI port. The 3G modem keeps its
connection up (our telecom provider has true flat rate on domestic 3G,
YMMV) and VPN's to the head office much like any other telecommuter. This
cuts through all telco stupidity with firewalled or NAT'ed 3G phones
etc, especially if one uses the break-out-from-hotel-LAN functions of
the VPN system. The router of course actively keeps the VPN up and
reestablishes it if needed.

how well does that work inside a big metal box like equinix?

You are, of course, just making a singular point: "Find something to
make yourself an OOB network, hey this thing does vpn over 3g, neato!"
I agree, it's neat.. it may not fit all square holes, sometimes you
need a round or triangle shaped plug.





Current thread: