nanog mailing list archives
Re: OOB
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:21:12 +0000
perhaps. but given a clean slate, would you: 1) live with more redundancy in the core and hope that you don't lose access to things downstream from a problem (or the problemchild itself) 2) think about a solution to provide OOB access via another infrastructure? Presume you can figure the costs as well so loss of a node/set-of-nodes SLA-wise is more expensive than 1yr of oob access? -chris
for those w/ OOB built on PSTN or other non-IP based fabrics, how much would it hurt if the PSTN went away? /bill
Current thread:
- OOB harbor235 (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB Måns Nilsson (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB Christopher Morrow (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB Joel Jaeggli (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB Måns Nilsson (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB PC (Jul 27)
- Re: OOB Arnold Nipper (Jul 26)
- Re: OOB harbor235 (Jul 26)